OPTIMIZATION OF 20 KV FEEDER NETWORKS USING THE GAUSS-SEIDEL METHOD TO REDUCE LOSSES AT PLN UP3 SEMARANG
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30659/Keywords:
Power Loss, Gauss-Seidel Method, 20 kV Feeder Network, Optimization, Semarang UP3Abstract
The rising demand for electrical energy, driven by population growth and technological advancements, presents challenges for PT PLN (Persero), Indonesia's main electricity provider. One key issue is reducing power losses in the distribution network, which affects both system efficiency and company revenue. This study explores the use of the Gauss-Seidel method for power flow analysis on the 20 kV distribution network at PLN UP3 Semarang, aiming to decrease losses and improve revenue. Using data on line impedance and load from PLN UP3 Semarang, the Gauss-Seidel method is applied via a Python script in Google Colab. The findings show that this method effectively reduces network losses, with potential financial benefits for PLN UP3 Semarang. This research also lays the groundwork for future network optimization strategies and contributes to the field of power flow analysis. The study is focused on the 20 kV network and does not compare the Gauss-Seidel method with other approaches.
Growing demand for electricity and the need for reliable distribution motivate continuous improvement of power-flow analysis and loss-reduction strategies in Indonesia’s medium-voltage networks. This paper applies the classical Gauss–Seidel (GS) load-flow to the 20 kV feeders of PLN UP3 Semarang using field parameters (line R/X, substation data, and aggregated loads) and an open computational workflow in Python/Google Colab. We build a Ybus model, adopt the per-unit system, and implement standard GS updates for PQ buses with a practical convergence tolerance. The study evaluates baseline conditions and several optimization scenarios (e.g., modest R/X adjustments reflecting conductor upgrades, improved feeder balancing, and initial-voltage tuning). Results show consistent reduction of technical losses across representative ULPs and at the UP3 level; monthly loss percentages also trend downward during the observation horizon. Voltage profiles improve at non-slack buses while remaining within typical planning limits. The analysis highlights how low-complexity, data-driven GS studies can support day-to-day planning decisions for feeder reconfiguration and targeted reinforcement. We discuss implementation limits (data quality, simplifications, and scenario dependence) and outline follow-up steps, including PV-bus modeling, comparison with Newton–Raphson, and integration with economic screening curves. The findings strengthen the case for using GS-based what-if analyses as a lightweight decision aid for utilities operating medium-voltage distribution networks
References
[1] Stevenson, W. D., & Grainger, J. J. (1994). "Power System Analysis." New York: McGraw-Hill.
[2] Glover, J. D., Sarma, M. S., & Overbye, T. (2012). "Power System Analysis and Design." Stamford: Cengage Learning.
[3] Dorf, R. C., & Svoboda, J. A. (2001). "Introduction to Electric Circuits." New York: John Wiley & Sons.
[4] Gunawan, A. W., & Setiawan, D. (2018). "Penerapan Metode Gauss-Seidel untuk Optimasi Jaringan Distribusi 20 kV." Jurnal Teknik Elektro, 12(2), 120-130.
[5] Hidayat, A., & Prasetyo, W. (2019). "Analisis Pengurangan Losses pada Jaringan Distribusi dengan Pendekatan Optimasi." Jurnal Energi dan Kelistrikan, 9(1), 45-55.
[6] Stott, B. (1974). Review of Load-Flow Calculation Methods. Proceedings of the IEEE, 62(7), 916-929. doi:10.1109/PROC.1974.9547.
[7] D. Shirmohammadi, H. W. Hong, A. Semlyen, and G. X. Luo.
"A Compensation-Based Power Flow Method for Weakly Meshed Distribution and Transmission Networks. "IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 753-762, May 1988.DOI: 10.1109/59.192932.
[8] PLN (Persero) UP3 Semarang. (2021). "Laporan Tahunan Kinerja Jaringan Distribusi." Semarang: PLN UP3 Semarang.
[9] Sudarman, H., & Priyanto, A. (2019). "Optimasi Jaringan Distribusi Menggunakan Metode Gauss-Seidel untuk Mengurangi Kehilangan Daya." Dalam “Seminar Nasional Teknologi Energi” (pp. 145-154). Bandung: ITB
[10] IEEE Power & Energy Society. (2018). "Guide for Electric Power Distribution Reliability Indices." IEEE Std 1366-2018.
[11] Prasetyo, B. (2019). "Optimasi Sistem Distribusi Listrik untuk Mengurangi Losses dengan Metode Numerik." Tesis, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta.
[12] Handoko, A. (2018). "Implementasi Algoritma Gauss-Seidel pada Optimasi Jaringan Distribusi Listrik." Disertasi, Institut Teknologi Bandung, Bandung.
[13] P. Kundur, Power System Stability and Control. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1994.
[14] J. J. Grainger and W. D. Stevenson Jr., Power System Analysis. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1994.
[15] H. Saadat, Power System Analysis, 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2004.
[16] J. D. Glover, M. S. Sarma, and T. J. Overbye, Power System Analysis and Design, 5th ed. Boston, MA: Cengage, 2012.
[17] A. R. Bergen and V. Vittal, Power Systems Analysis, 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 2000.
[18] W. H. Kersting, Distribution System Modeling and Analysis, 4th ed. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 2017. Routledge
[19] B. Stott, “Review of load-flow calculation methods,” Proc. IEEE, vol. 62, no. 7, pp. 916–929, 1974, doi:10.1109/PROC.1974.9544. teee.eu
[20] W. F. Tinney and C. E. Hart, “Power flow solution by Newton’s method,” IEEE Trans. Power Apparatus and Systems, vol. PAS-86, no. 11, pp. 1449–1460, 1967. ScienceDirect
[21] R. D. Zimmerman, C. E. Murillo-Sánchez, and R. J. Thomas, “MATPOWER: Steady-State Operations, Planning, and Analysis Tools for Power Systems Research and Education,” IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 12–19, Feb. 2011, doi:10.1109/TPWRS.2010.2051168. matpower.org
[22] M. E. Baran and F. F. Wu, “Network reconfiguration in distribution systems for loss reduction and load balancing,” IEEE Trans. Power Del., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 1401–1407, Apr. 1989, doi:10.1109/61.25627. hanspub.org
[23] S. Civanlar, J. J. Grainger, H. Yin, and S. S. H. Lee, “Distribution feeder reconfiguration for loss reduction,” IEEE Trans. Power Del., vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 1217–1223, Jul. 1988, doi:10.1109/61.193906.
[24] D. Shirmohammadi and H. W. Hong, “Reconfiguration of electric distribution networks for resistive line losses reduction,” IEEE Trans. Power Del., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 1492–1498, 1989. SpringerLink
[25] S. K. Goswami and S. K. Basu, “A new algorithm for the reconfiguration of distribution feeders for loss minimization,” IEEE Trans. Power Del., vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 1484–1491, Jul. 1992, doi:10.1109/61.141868. SciSpace
[26] T. Taylor and D. Lubkeman, “Implementation of heuristic search strategies for distribution feeder reconfiguration,” IEEE Trans. Power Del., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 239–246, Jan. 1990. SpringerLink
[27] A. Merlin and H. Back, “Search for a minimal-loss operating spanning tree configuration in an urban power distribution system,” in Proc. 5th Power System Computation Conf. (PSCC), Cambridge, U.K., 1975, pp. 1–18.
[28] J. S. Savier and D. Das, “Impact of network reconfiguration on loss allocation of radial distribution systems,” IEEE Trans. Power Del., vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 2473–2480, Oct. 2007, doi:10.1109/TPWRD.2007.905370. SCIRP
[29] H. D. Chiang and R. J. Jumeau, “Optimal network reconfigurations in distribution systems—Part I: A new formulation and a solution methodology,” IEEE Trans. Power Del., vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 1902–1909, Oct. 1990.
[30] K. Nara, A. Shiose, M. Kitagawa, and T. Ishihara, “Implementation of genetic algorithm for distribution systems loss minimum reconfiguration,” IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 1044–1051, Aug. 1992.
[31] H. Lotfi et al., “Power Distribution Network Reconfiguration Techniques: A Thorough Review,” Sustainability, vol. 16, no. 23, art. 10307, 2024, doi: 10.3390/su162310307.
[32] A. A. El-Fergany, “Reviews on Load Flow Methods in Electric Distribution Networks,” Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering, 2024, doi: 10.1007/s11831-024-10191-7.
[33] M. Rahimipour Behbahani, A. Jalilian, A. Bahmanyar, and D. Ernst, “Comprehensive Review on Static and Dynamic Distribution Network Reconfiguration Methodologies,” IEEE Access, vol. 12, pp. 9511–9525, 2024.
[34] D. W. Puma, Y. P. Molina, B. A. Atoccsa, J. E. Luyo, and Z. Ñaupari, “Distribution Network Reconfiguration Optimization Using a New Algorithm Hyperbolic Tangent Particle Swarm Optimization (HT-PSO),” Energies, vol. 17, no. 15, art. 3798, 2024, doi: 10.3390/en17153798.
[35] X. Wang, W. Chen, R. Tian, Y. Ji, and J. Zhu, “Fast power flow calculation for distribution networks based on graph models and hierarchical forward-backward sweep parallel algorithm,” Frontiers in Energy Research, vol. 12, art. 1465900, Aug. 2024, doi: 10.3389/fenrg.2024.1465900.
Downloads
Published
Data Availability Statement
The customer-level load data and network parameters were obtained under a data-sharing agreement with PT PLN (Persero) UP3 Semarang and cannot be shared publicly due to contractual and privacy restrictions. An anonymized, aggregated feature table and the analysis scripts for the Gauss–Seidel workflow are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 febi rubi (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
License. Articles in PULSE—JEIB are published open access under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license. This permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as appropriate credit is given to the original authors and the source, a link to the license is provided, and changes are indicated.
Copyright. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication. The publisher may archive and index the published version and its metadata in trusted services (e.g., Crossref, PKP PN/LOCKSS/CLOCKSS).
Fees. APC: no fee (no submission or processing charges).
